|
The Channel One Removal Kit
Print out these pages, photocopy, and distribute
to members of your community. Those that defend Channel One's
presence in your schools have little to support their position.
You have common sense and a wealth of organizations on your side.
Remember
that you do not have to "prove
the negative." You can easily prove Channel One is inappropriate
for students, but you should not have to. The school board has
the burden of proof. They have to prove that Channel One is educational
sound. They can't do that. Even if they could, the next step would
be to show that it makes financial sense. That is impossible.
Don't have your board turn the tables and
say that you haven't proven Channel One is bad. Don't let them
get away with saying the students and teachers like it so we are
keeping it. Teachers want the equipment, few want the TV show.
Principals and superintendents often will publicly praise Channel
One and then ask teachers how they feel. Teachers will support
their principal, especially if they are told they may lose their
TV sets.
No, the
school board needs to provide the
community with hard proof that Channel One's TV show is educationally
sound. Demand testing results. If there isn't any, ask why there
isn't any for all the years its has been in your schools. Ask
for the evaluation of the program by the school system. If there
hasn't been any, ask why was everyone "asleep at the switch." Ask for
a copy of the financial analysis of the Channel One contract. If there isn't
any in the files, ask how did we know this was
a good deal. Ask that an independent accountant to review the
trading of one hour a week of school time for the rental value
of the TV equipment.
Ask for the school board attorney to issue
an opinion on requiring children to view this program.
Some school board members and superintendents
will be very defensive about Channel One. They might have invited
Channel One into the school years ago. Even if they are new, they
may be very embarrassed by not knowing about Channel One. Be patient
with your board. Sooner or later, they will understand that they
have no right to allow Channel One access to the schoolchildren
in their charge.
If the board does not remove Channel One,
ask the board to require INFORMED WRITTEN CONSENT from all parents
and guardians before Channel One is shown to a child. Parents
should be told in unambiguous terms that Channel One is Controversial,
that Channel One is opposed by many educational organization,
that Channel One advertises products, TV shows, and movies to
children (a list of products and entertainment shows should be
given to parents to show what was advertised last year - you can
get this off our web site), and that if your child watches Channel
One they will spend at least one instructional week of school
watching the show (at least 31 hours). If a parent has no problem
with that then they should sign a form for their child to watch
Channel One. Any pro-Channel One information a superintendent
can find can be given to parents also.
This will kill Channel One. Few parents
given the facts will allow their child to waste such large amounts
of time on this controversial TV show. If your board doesn't allow
INFORMED WRITTEN CONSENT, then you have a board that doesn't trust
parents, and you have a much graver situation then just having
Channel One in your school. Praise all board members and superintendents
that stand up to Channel One. They need to hear from the community.
Good luck, remember it is the minority of secondary schools in
the country that have Channel One.
What 2006 graduating seniors have seen on Channel One News. (handout)
National PTA resolution
from National PTA newsletter (September 19, 2006)
National PTA opposes the exploitation of students through commercial operations that require students to view advertising or to study specific instructional programs as a condition of the school’s receiving a donation of money or a donation or loan of equipment. National PTA has previously taken positions against Channel One and has sought its removal from schools, and now joins with other children’s advocates to oppose BusRadio as well. With BusRadio installed on school buses, parents will not be able to exercise any type of control over their children’s exposure. Parents cannot opt out of having their children hear what’s playing throughout the school bus. Furthermore, children as young as 6 years old will hear the BusRadio programming, even though BusRadio boasts that it will “take targeted student marketing to the next level” and that it gives advertisers “a unique and effective way to reach the highly sought after teen and tween market.”
The Hidden Cost of Channel One (Estimates fo the fifty states. Center for the Analysis of Commercialism in Education)
"Children,Adolescents,
and Advertising" American Academy of Pediatrics (Channel One mentioned.)
Association
for Supervision and Curriculum Development
This is a well-respected
educational organization that says "No" to promoting
brand name products in school. This position paper is an important
statement from an important group.
Eagle Forum's Channel One Web Page
"What One Person Can Do About Channel One." American Family Association
Wall Street
Journal article
How
to Cheat on a Book Report by Channel One
page 2
page 3
Pass this around to
parents and teachers and see the anger in their faces. This is
from their official web site that children could only find out
about from the in-school TV show. "Cheating isn't easy." That's why Channel One News wants to help kids learn the art. Channel One took down this article
only after U.S. Senator Richard Shelby called for hearings
on the company.
Southern
Baptist Convention resolution opposing Channel One
This powerful resolution, alone, should be enough
to remove Channel One. Official SBC page where resolution can
be found. http://dddweb.com/sbc99/res8.htm
National Council
of Teachers of English resolution opposing Channel One
This 1992
resolution is still this organization's position in 1999. English
teachers want "print enriched" environments for children,
not classrooms with blaring Channel One TVs.
Resolved, that the National Council of Teachers of English oppose intrusions of commercial television advertising, such as Channel One, in the classroom;
that NCTE seek alliances with other educational and consumer groups opposing intrusions of commercial television advertising in the classroom;
that NCTE urge schools not to adopt programs or renew contracts involving use of materials that include mandatory exposure of students to commercial television advertising; and
that NCTE encourage teachers and others to take appropriate counter measures to resist intrusions of commercial television advertising in classrooms and assist them in their efforts. |
How To Be Stupid - The Lessons Of Channel One.
Ten Reasons To Get Rid Of Channel One. (brochure) second page.
American Association
of School Administrators
Alabama
PTA letter opposing Channel One
Typical
Channel One Contract -use this to show that Channel
One is intended teenagers and that no middle or junior high school should be
showing it.
Birmingham
News Editorial Opposing Channel One
Our state's
largest paper urges schools to remove Channel One.
Frequently
Asked Questions
Overview of Channel One.
|